Steam & Mist: Shadow Over Silestra
On top of that, art dumpage!
 |
| Facial Study of Frederick |
 | |||||||||
| EAF Gas Mask Design |
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
Book 1 is COMPLETE!
Hey chickadees! Been caught up in a lot of work in summer sessions. But there is good news! :D Book 1 of Steam & Mist is done!
Steam & Mist: Shadow Over Silestra
On top of that, art dumpage!
Stay tuned for more, kiddies! :D
Steam & Mist: Shadow Over Silestra
On top of that, art dumpage!
Friday, June 3, 2011
Spiel and a Possible Book
I guess I should update this, even if my production has slowed to a crawl. On a more positive note however, I'm really close to finishing my first book! :D I have maybe a little more to go and then Steam &Mist: Shadow Over Silestra, will be complete, and, if I dare risk it, I'll enter it in to an editor/publisher and see what they say. Then it's the fun part of transcribing it to a screenplay and all that jazz.
Yes I know, I hear many folks in the back of my head saying, "But, aren't you going a bit too far? You haven't even finished college yet."
My answer?
So what?
Ideas never stop coming to me, and I'm glad I have the ability to write and/or draw them down, otherwise I'd be a very sad person :< I suppose being "forced" to take basic art classes (since I didn't do it last year >>...oops) has reawakened the love I have for art. Yes, it's always been there, but you know, after a while, when you're doing art by the demands of another and not giving time to yourself, you lose that avaunt-garde belief of "art for art's sake". Hell, that term didn't even exist 70 years ago.
I'm taking Survey of Art History, which goes from cave paintings in Lascaux, Altamira and Chauvet (major inspiration) to medieval art. To say I am a kid in the candy store is an understatement. But then I'm also taking a History of Contemporary Art (1865-Present). Now for some, you might stop and go "Hold up, I thought contemporary art was all those squiggly lines, paint splatters and soup cans nonsense?" You're partially right, but that came later, in the "modern" period (post WWII). Yeah, now we're getting goofy with "post-modern" art definitions and all that jazz, but my point is I've learned a lot in this class- mostly, a new appreciation for art I originally saw as a joke (and in some cases, like with Marcel Duchamp, they were (if you don't know what I'm talking about, look up "Fountain, a Readymade artwork").
It's also opened my mind a little bit more on artwork- the guy you see who floods the Sydney Opera house with trees and foliage- A Forest of Lines (2008), the graffiti artist who's notorious for his itinerary to be fifty two pickup- Banksy, they are all telling a story.
I think my professor put it best in the analogy of language- once you understand the language, break the code that they are saying, the world of art opens up to you. Art is a language that has no dictionary, no phonetic spelling or can possibly be transcribed on paper in the exact approach that art does. It's like translating the Koran- we can only glean a basic translation, but what it's truly saying we may not know or understand in our language. The same goes for art- the only way to understand art is to speak art. And it may take the form of a paintbrush, a sculpture, the design for an ad, the way a person can move, how water arches through the air, how light travels and changes color, the way stone is formed, how random chance arranges objects on a floor.
I should get a spot on TED for this.
Yes I know, I hear many folks in the back of my head saying, "But, aren't you going a bit too far? You haven't even finished college yet."
My answer?
So what?
Ideas never stop coming to me, and I'm glad I have the ability to write and/or draw them down, otherwise I'd be a very sad person :< I suppose being "forced" to take basic art classes (since I didn't do it last year >>...oops) has reawakened the love I have for art. Yes, it's always been there, but you know, after a while, when you're doing art by the demands of another and not giving time to yourself, you lose that avaunt-garde belief of "art for art's sake". Hell, that term didn't even exist 70 years ago.
I'm taking Survey of Art History, which goes from cave paintings in Lascaux, Altamira and Chauvet (major inspiration) to medieval art. To say I am a kid in the candy store is an understatement. But then I'm also taking a History of Contemporary Art (1865-Present). Now for some, you might stop and go "Hold up, I thought contemporary art was all those squiggly lines, paint splatters and soup cans nonsense?" You're partially right, but that came later, in the "modern" period (post WWII). Yeah, now we're getting goofy with "post-modern" art definitions and all that jazz, but my point is I've learned a lot in this class- mostly, a new appreciation for art I originally saw as a joke (and in some cases, like with Marcel Duchamp, they were (if you don't know what I'm talking about, look up "Fountain, a Readymade artwork").
It's also opened my mind a little bit more on artwork- the guy you see who floods the Sydney Opera house with trees and foliage- A Forest of Lines (2008), the graffiti artist who's notorious for his itinerary to be fifty two pickup- Banksy, they are all telling a story.
I think my professor put it best in the analogy of language- once you understand the language, break the code that they are saying, the world of art opens up to you. Art is a language that has no dictionary, no phonetic spelling or can possibly be transcribed on paper in the exact approach that art does. It's like translating the Koran- we can only glean a basic translation, but what it's truly saying we may not know or understand in our language. The same goes for art- the only way to understand art is to speak art. And it may take the form of a paintbrush, a sculpture, the design for an ad, the way a person can move, how water arches through the air, how light travels and changes color, the way stone is formed, how random chance arranges objects on a floor.
I should get a spot on TED for this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Flattr this blog!
